
Audience research
Part of Judges read the entries or the market does, business awards audience research
When to run business awards competitor research
A practical guide to timing business awards competitor research around category choice, budget planning and shortlist publication.
What to take away
- Business awards competitor research pays at three points in the awards cycle: when you choose a category, when you agree a budget, and when a shortlist is published.
- For UK-wide examples, track the King's Awards for Enterprise and the FSB Celebrating Small Business Awards, checking each scheme's published categories and outcomes.
- Judge crowding by entrants per shortlist place, not by total entries.
- Keep one shared table of schemes, years, categories, entrants, size bands and outcomes.
- Refresh it 90 days before every deadline, and note the source and date of each figure.
Three points in the awards cycle
Timing matters more than depth. A fortnight spent checking two schemes beats a three-month study that lands after the deadline.
Start when choosing a category: compare eligibility, categories and past shortlists before committing. Revisit the research when agreeing your budget, so you can prioritise the schemes and categories that fit it. When a shortlist is published, update your table with the named entrants and outcomes, then use that evidence to shape the next cycle.
Research done after you have drafted an entry can still inform next year's plan, but it may be too late to change this year's category or scheme.
When research pays off
- Before choosing categoryaudit schemes
- Before agreeing budgetcheck crowding
- After shortlist publishedupdate table
- Outside windowsbusywork
If you are still choosing which schemes suit you, the wider business awards audience research guide for England sets out the order of work.
Checklist for England-based entrants
- Confirm the scheme operates in England and accepts your legal structure.
- Pull the last two cycles of shortlists and winners for every category on your list.
- Count entrants per category, then divide by the number of shortlist places.
- Note the size bands of typical winners. If every winner employs 500 people and you employ 12, look elsewhere.
- Check whether the same names recur across several schemes.
- Read the judging criteria line by line and mark what you can evidence today.
- Check the sponsor list. A new headline sponsor often brings a refreshed category.
- Look for categories added in the last 12 months. Their fields are usually thinner.
- Record the source and date for every figure.
- Set a review date 90 days before the entry deadline.
Example: counting the field in one category
Illustrative figures follow, not real results. Suppose a category shortlists three firms and its entry list, trade coverage and press releases identify 40 entrants. That is 13.3 entrants per place. A second category shortlists two places and you can find 12 entrants, which is 6 per place. The first is roughly twice as hard.
Counting the field in one category
- Collect entry lists, shortlists and trade coverage for the last two cycles.
- Count distinct entrants per category.
- Divide that count by the number of shortlist places.
- Compare the size bands of past winners with your own.
Sponsor change is the usual trigger for a category to shift. When a headline sponsor steps back, a category is often renamed, split or dropped, then relaunched under the new backer with altered criteria. Put last year's category list beside this year's before you commit.
If the count changes how many categories you can afford, our business awards budget template shows how to cost entries per scheme.
Tracking shortlists and winners in a table
One shared file keeps the pattern visible across cycles. The template below is illustrative, not real results.
Tracking shortlists and winners
| Scheme | Year | Category | Entrant | Size band | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional business awards | 2025 | Best small employer | Regional manufacturer | 20 to 49 staff | Finalist |
| Regional business awards | 2025 | Best small employer | B2B software firm | Under 10 staff | Winner |
| National sector awards | 2024 | Communications team | In-house comms team | 50 to 249 staff | Not shortlisted |
| National sector awards | 2025 | Communications team | In-house comms team | 50 to 249 staff | Shortlisted |
Sort rows by category once two cycles are in. Recurring names tell you where judges hold a settled view. Do not read a shortlist as a ranking, because alphabetical order carries no score information. Keep the file where a colleague can update it.
Where the numbers come from
Published counts are the most defensible starting point. The UK business: activity, size and location release and the business population estimates give numbers of registered and unregistered businesses by region and size band. The ONS lists release dates on its business, industry and trade statistics hub.
The business population estimates for 2016 remain useful for showing whether a sector has grown or shrunk over a decade, which is a defensible line in an entry.
For a rival's size band, filed accounts beat a website claim. Check filing history and accounts on Companies House before assuming a competitor matches your scale.
Pairing competitor research with audience research
Competitor research shows who you face. Audience research shows what judges and sponsors reward. Our guide to the business awards target audience in England maps judges, sponsors and press into one view. Judges change between cycles, so note the panel before you write. A new chair often shifts what the criteria reward.
Common questions
How often should I repeat competitor research?
Once per awards cycle is enough for most entrants. If a scheme changes its criteria mid-cycle, redo the category count within 30 days.
Can I rely on shortlists alone?
No. Shortlists show finalists only. Pair them with published business counts to see how many firms could have entered and did not.
What if a category has no previous winners?
New categories usually have thinner fields. Check the sponsor's launch material and the entry deadline before assuming it is wide open.
Does research replace a strong entry?
No. It tells you where to compete. The entry still has to evidence the criteria.



